Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- kb:nesting [2018/07/29 20:52] – [Handling of Radiation in the Nesting Area] enviadmin
+++ kb:nesting [2018/07/29 20:59] (current) – enviadmin
@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 The only difference between example A and B is that in (A) we have used only 3 nesting grid cells around the core domain whereas in (B) 5 of them are used. As the grid size of the nesting grids is increasing with each grid, the area is extending very fast with each extra Nesting Grid. The grid points inside the nesting area have an increasing horizontal resolution with
-<fs x-large>''dxy(n 1)=dxy(n) dxy(Main)''</fs>
+$$ \Delta xy (n)= \Delta xy(Main) *n  $$
-where //dxy(Main)// is the resolution of the main model and //n// is the first grid of the nesting zone.
+where $\Delta xy(Main)$ is the resolution of the main model and $n$ is the index of the nesting grid starting with 1 at the model borders.
+The more Nesting Grids you use, the lower is the chance that you will get numerical problems because one or more of your model boders are interfering with internal model dynamics.
-The more Nesting Grids you use, the lower is the chance that you will get numerical problems because one or more of your model boder are interfering with internal model dynamics.
 ENVI-met will warn you, if the flow field is not stable after 10 sec of integration time and suggest to increase the number of Nesting Grids. If you are not sure what causes your problems, you should always try to increase the number of Nesting Grids to be sure that this is not the point of trouble.